What will McCain do about our economy and the housing crisis?
McCain on the Housing Crisis: Quick, Do Nothing!
Don’t just do something, stand there! And wait for somebody else to suggest a course of action.
That appears to be John McCain’s approach to the housing credit crisis. On Tuesday, he delivered what his campaign billed as a major address on the housing crisis. What made it notable was that it contained nothing notable.
McCain started off stating the obvious: there was a housing bubble: "speculators move into markets, and these players begin to suspend the normal rules of risk and assume that prices can only move up — but never down….The normal market forces of people buying and selling their homes were overwhelmed by rampant speculation. Our system of market checks and balances did not correct this until the bubble burst." Lenders went wild and some Americans bought homes they could not afford. And, he added, "the housing bubble was made worse by a series of complex, interconnected financial bets that were not transparent or fully understood….Because managers did not fully understand the complex financial instruments and because there was insufficient transparency when they did try to learn, the initial losses spawned a crisis of confidence in the markets."
Anyone who watches a cable business show–even only during the commercial breaks on American Idol–knows this. The question is, what would a President McCain do about it. Short answer: not much.
"I will not play election year politics with the housing crisis," he declared, adding, "I have always been committed to the principle that it is not the duty of government to bail out and reward those who act irresponsibly, whether they are big banks or small borrowers." That’s a fine sentiment. Tough love. Let the markets take care of things. But does he have any idea how to make the system work better? How to make sure that people victimized by predatory lenders have a shot at solvency? How to ensure that whole neighborhoods don’t collapse?
Not really. Instead McCain only offered guidelines for what might be acceptable; he did not offer any specific initiatives:
In our effort to help deserving homeowners, no assistance should be given to speculators. Any assistance for borrowers should be focused solely on homeowners, not people who bought houses for speculative purposes, to rent or as second homes. Any assistance must be temporary and must not reward people who were irresponsible at the expense of those who weren’t. I will consider any and all proposals based on their cost and benefits.
He called for greater transparency and a high standard of ethics in the mortgage business and noted that home buyers ought to provide "responsible" down payments. "I am prepared to examine new proposals and evaluate them based on these principals," McCain said. In other words, let someone else come up with a good idea.
McCain did call for a "meeting of the nation’s accounting professionals," and he urged the top mortgage lenders "to do everything possible to keep families in their homes and businesses growing." But his general approach was clear: hands off. He’s not offering much to voters who are hurting financially or nervous about the housing crisis.
If this is a preview of McCain’s fall campaign, Democrats ought to be heartened. Assuming that economic insecurity will be an issue in the general election, will voters be hankering for a laissez-faire champion who says that the markets will sort it all out and who is willing to do no more than to beseech big financial firms to do right by the little guy and gal? McCain’s speech signaled he might be even less of an economic activist than George W. Bush. If so, that could set up a fall contest reminiscent of the Bill Clinton-George Bush match of 1992–whether or not a Clinton is involved.
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
5 comments
J. Philip Real Estate on August 5, 2009 at 10:30 pm
Actually McCain has already voted to expand the FHA program and the raise the fannie mae and freddie mac limits. This has all been done in the past 6 months. Too late? Yup, but both parties are at fault. This will do a great deal toward cutting off the head of the subprime snake and those awful 2/28 and 3/27 adjustable mortgages. Future spikes in real estate will be shorter lived and easier managed with less disasterous consequences.
BTW, this forum isn’t about politics. But if you must stand on your soap box, get the facts.
Chuck P on August 5, 2009 at 10:30 pm
It will be over by the time the election comes around anyway. So why address an issue that is a none issue. The home builders and lenders are already making headway’s on the restructuring and all is being done that can be. If you expect the government to pay off every ones mortgage that won’t happen. These people that are losing their homes have no one to blame but themselves, they bought houses they couldn’t afford, now it’s time to refinance and they can’t get the financing. That was the risk they choose. Don’t expect the government to keep bailing you out because you are to dumb to run your own finances. It’s your responsibility face up to it. There in lies the main difference between the Republicans and the Democrats, Republicans can live without the government, while the Democrats need the government to live.
src50 on August 5, 2009 at 10:30 pm
Lemme guess: you’re a Democrat.
RE its what i do on August 5, 2009 at 10:30 pm
I agree, why does our government have to fix a problem they didnt create? If you want to complain about them look to the democrats who want to open our borders with mexico and canada – as if we dont have enough problems with illegals and company’s moving out of this country. Or maybe you want government health care – that way nobody gets any help and we all get to pay for it.
While not a republican fan, I cant vote for either democrat, at least not with a clear conscience. I think Ron Paul would be the best bet.
Oh, and btw this is not the political section – go ther if you must complain
bonsai on August 5, 2009 at 10:30 pm
McSame has no ideas, but he could get a good team together. The problem with a team is, they can go of on their own, like Cheney, Rove, Rice and Rumsfeld did.
I just hope for the sake of the nation, at least 50,1% of the voters will have enough brains to vote for a democrat.