Economically Speaking, do you think Malinvestment could be part of the problem with the economy?
Now that the crooks are trying to liquidate them? "The Daily Capitalist Blog" said It is different at the regional and local banking level. Most of them held on to their bad loans as long as they could to avoid recognizing losses, which would require them to either raise more capital or fail. The banking regulators have largely facilitated this approach by suspending mark-to-market rules, requiring them to take TARP money, plus other accounting rules.
See the rest of this post if interested
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheDailyCapitalist/~3/OxKJFw3TBnk/
But these lenders cannot hold back the flood. Both commercial and residential real estate continues to decline in value. There was so much overproduction (malinvestment) that four years after the crash the problem still festers. The result was that these banks tightened up lending standards, were wary of committing to new loans, and kept bad projects on life support hoping that things would turn around. Thus the credit crunch. They are the lenders that one-half of American businesses rely on for credit.
But now is there a growing trend to liquidate these investments